Daily Home Renovation Tips

Home energy savings, improvement & maintenance experiences, one house at a time.

Daily Home Renovation Tips header image 2

ecoENERGY Residential Retrofit - After 18 Months, Is It Serving Individual Canadian Homeowners?

October 3rd, 2008 · 2 Comments

Long title for an article, I know.

October 1, 2008 marked the 18 month anniversary of the ecoENERGY Retrofit program which provides Canadian home and property owners with up to $5,000 in Federal grants to offset the cost of specific energy conservation related renovations as identified in an Energy Efficiency Assessment (i.e. energy audit) by an accredited independent professional.

We have written previously about the program, focusing on the Residential Retrofit portion. As stated in our article Earth Day, ecoENERGY Retrofit, and the Minister of Natural Resources Canada back on April 22, 2008, key metrics of the Residential Retrofit portion include:

  • Available Funding - $160 million (over the program duration)
  • Program Duration - 4 years ending March 31, 20011
  • Eligible Canadian Residences - 9,991,450

After 18 months, here are some of the high level results to date (April 1, 2007 to October 1, 2008). We would like to thank Media Relations at Natural Resources Canada for compiling the statistics so quickly and providing them to us as they have in the past.

  • Fully Participating Canadian Residences (both ‘D’ & ‘E’ energy audits)
    • Number:
      • 12 Months Ending 01-APR-08 -   17,653
      • 18 Months Ending 01-OCT-08 -  42,000
      • 48 Months Target 01-APR-11 - 140,000
    • Percentage:
      • 12 Months Ending 01-APR-08 - 0.17%
      • 18 Months Ending 01-OCT-08 - 0.42%
      • 48 Months Target 01-APR-11 -  1.40%
        • (140,000 / 9,991,450)
  • Partially Participating Canadian Residences (’D’ energy audit only)
    • Number:
      • 12 Months Ending 01-APR-08 - 102,845
      • 18 Months Ending 01-OCT-08 - 229,000

[NOTE: All data above provided by Natural Resources Canada with our thanks. More details from the 12 month period can be reviewed by accessing  our prior article ecoENERGY Retrofit Program - 1st Anniversary Progress ]

Now, it should be remembered that applicants (i.e. home owners) have up to 18 months to have the second, or ‘E’, energy efficiency assessment (i.e. energy audit) performed to become eligible to receive not only the Federal grants under the program but also matching Provincial grants (in participating provinces). This 18 month time limit is starting to be reached by the earliest participants, likely causing some the acceleration  in fully participating residences per the above from 17,653 after 12 months to more than double in the next 6 month period, or 42,000 after 18 months.

Now, I remain surprised (and somewhat disappointed and chagrined) that there as been no public debate, discussion or analysis which has come to our attention regarding some of the 48 month targets.

Is it reasonable for Canadian home owners to expect their Federal Government to directly help them financially to make their homes more energy efficient and thereby consume less non-renewable resources while simultaneously reduce polluting emissions at all?

Is it sufficient for the Federal Government have the target of directly helping only 1.40 per cent of Canadian households to become more energy efficient?

One point four percent; not 14.0 per cent, 1.40 per cent.

Or, to put it another way, is it acceptable that the Federal Government is planning to not directly assist 98.60% of Canadian households become more energy efficient?

Based on $160 million in funding over the 4 year period and a target of 140,000 fully participating applicants, the program will provide on average approximately $1,142 to each fully participating applicant. Is this number sufficient?

We wrote previously about the two quotes we received for a natural gas tankless water heater. After both the Federal and the matching Provincial government ecoENERGY grants, we would still have to pay out of our pocket $2,600+ and would be looking at an 8 year+ financial payback.

Would you be motivated, as a home owner with a mortgage, food, clothing, RRSP contributions, RESP contributions to spend $2,600 with an 8 year financial payback?

And, natural gas, while much cleaner than oil, remains a non-renewable resource whose consumption produces polluting emissions into the air.

We have written about the recent pilot initiative of the program to encourage the mass deployment of solar water heaters whose goal is to determine the optimal marketing of solar water heaters to the Canadian residential market. Our high level estimates (to be confirmed by a firm quote from a participating firm) is that the additional program funding may make the investment for the installation of a solar water heater similar to that of tankless water heaters.

So, where are we after 18 months? I’ll leave to the politicians (gee, I think there is an election on right now :-) ) and the media pundants the opinions to the above noted questions which we have asked. Tomorrow, we are to receive more detailed information from Natural Resources Canada on the first 18 months of the ecoENERGY Residential Retrofit program which we will use to analyse in more depth the results to date.

Tags: Energy Conservation · ecoENERGY

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Rebecca Atkinson (Muller) // Oct 3, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    Funnily enough, this post resonates with me as I am one of the Canadians who have gone through one round of energy audits, yet haven’t done the second one yet. I believe I have about 6 months left.

    My husband and I have made a lot of changes and plan on making a few more (new windows the last this Spring) so we can hopefully qualify for some of the grants.

    We know we already won’t qualify for the hi-efficiency furnace as we opted not to go hi-eff, for similar reasons to your tankless hot water heater.

    The cost of the hi-eff furnace and the additional “renovations” required to put holes in my house so it could vent outside, as well the length of time it would take to earn back the savings.. did not outweigh the advantages and cost of simply doing a mid-eff 2 (variable) speed furnace for us.

    However, regardless of what - if any -grants we get back we’re happy we did the audit, as we learned a lot and hopefully have improved many of the problem areas identified.

  • 2 Dan // Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Hi Rebecca (I have an internet friend out in NB with the same first name and I thought for a second it was her who left this comment :-) )

    Did you look at tankless or solar water heaters? The link towards the end of this article describes the pilot program for the mass deployment of solar water heaters that might be of interest to you.

    Since I also live in the GTA-ish area, if you email me directly I can give you the name of the person at the company who is participating in our area in case you want to learn more and see if it is right for you.

    We are waiting for them to come over to our home and give us an exact quote, including installation in our specific home since it can vary from one home to the next).

    Dan

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word